News RSS Feed


WALTHAM FOREST: Council apologises for poor fund fiasco

11:08am Wednesday 23rd July 2008

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »

By Jonathan Bunn »

SERIOUS failings in the management of regeneration funds have forced the council to promise to change the way it does business.

During a sombre Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, council leader Clyde Loakes and chief executive Roger Taylor apologised for mistakes by officers which led to rules aimed at preventing fraud being repeatedly broken over a number of years.

Investigations into deals involving the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF) and its successor, the Better Neighbourhood Initiative (BNI), uncovered a systematic failure to safeguard the proper use of money earmarked to help the most disadvantaged in Waltham Forest.

Five council officers are currently under investigation for not reporting the alleged fraudulent use of public money by EduAction, the private company which used to run education in the borough.

No firm evidence of corruption has been uncovered, although the authority cannot rule it out.

A probe into claims EduAction misused £240,000 it was paid to help vulnerable teenagers through the Youth at Risk program will be published at the end of the month.

But a damning interim report into the council’s role in the affair, and the authorities’ general handling of NRF and BNI, has forced cabinet to agree wholesale procedural changes aimed at ensuring much closer scrutiny of officers.

Tighter contract monitoring systems will be introduced in all departments and the officers authorised to approve contracts will be reviewed.

Chief executive Roger Taylor said: “I feel these things are so worrying and serious it is incumbent on me to apologise to councillors about the way things have been conducted.

“Others who work for the council have let you down. These are simple regulations set out for people to follow. In the future any breach of these rules will lead to immediate disciplinary action.”

Cllr Loakes admitted he was ‘very upset’ about the situation.

He said: “We have let residents down, we have been let down as councillors - I am very disappointed.”

“This council has a lot of work to do to rebuild confidence in this organisation and how residents believe we are operating. It is clear this council cannot hide and I have not intention of hiding my disappointment and anger. We have clearly taken our eye of the ball.”

However Conservative group leader Cllr Matt Davis insisted councillors as well has officers must be held to account for failings.

He said: "As far as I'm concerned the fact that no elected members are mentioned in the reports completely removes their credibility. There must be political accountability."

Nick Tiratsoo has researched the council's handling of NRF and BNI over the last few years and is responsible for uncovering many of the issues now being addressed.

His inquiries raised serious concerns about a £47,000 NRF contract awarded to consultants Dr Foster Intelligence for research which was subsequently been found to be flawed.

A council investigation eventually revealed procurement rules had been broken when the contract was awarded.

He said: "I first raised grave concerns about the contracting and monitoring of NRF expenditure with Cllr Loakes in March 2004, and in the following years repeatedly wrote to him about this matter.

"In early 2007, he finally met with me and assured me that though there had been issues, he was taking a personal and vigorous interest in putting things right.

"Subsequently, both Council officers and councillors have either stonewalled my questions, or provided answers of dubious merit. Indeed, as recently as November 2007, the interim chief executive, Roger Taylor, told me regarding the procurement of Dr Foster Intelligence contract: 'I am satisfied that this matter was dealt with appropriately' - a judgement which was subsequently contradicted by the Council own audit and fraud team in a devastatingly critical report.

"Councillor Loakes and Mr Taylor now appear to believe that they are part of the solution to the Council's current deep malaise. I believe that they are in fact part of the problem."

Referring to the ongoing investigation into YAR, which is due to be published at the end of the month, Cllr Chris Robbins, cabinet member for children and young people, said evidence is being contested by EduAction.

Your Say Your Guardian

Dave Hall, Walthamstow says...
6:25pm Wed 23 Jul 08

So councillors and council officers were warned about shortcomings within the system years ago, and just blustered their way out of it. Only council officers seem to be under investigation. Why?

Walthamster, Walthamstow says...
7:07pm Wed 23 Jul 08

Chief executive Roger Taylor says "Others who work for the council have let you down."
Council leader Clyde Loakes says "we have been let down as councillors"

No, Mr Loakes and Mr Taylor. You are the highly paid people in charge. This is totally your responsibility. A few weeks ago Mr Loakes was still saying the report containing 40% fake postcodes was acceptable.

It was an unpaid local resident, Nick Tiratsoo, who did all the work on uncovering this scandal, which I think we can all see is the tip of an iceberg. He not only had no help from the council, but had to fight it all the way.

It is you who have let the people of Waltham Forest down, Mr Taylor and Mr Loakes.

You are not the solution. You are at the heart of the problem.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
10:49pm Wed 23 Jul 08

Walthamster is spot on. Its no use apologising and thinking that we should all 'move on'. The public has seen too much of that kind of thing from Labour and will not be fooled any more.

There has been far too much resistance by Cllr Loakes and others to the truth coming out. Well, now its beginning to, and I do not see how the position of Cllr Laokes can be tenible: he has failed the people of this borough. If he had an ounce of honour he would resign.

Chris15, Essex says...
11:16pm Wed 23 Jul 08

All local authorities have to adopt standing orders and standing financial instructions. There is probably a model specified by central government, departures from which are rarely permitted.
LBWF has such standing orders and standing financial instructions which it calls its Constitution.
Its not a fun thing to read -especially if you're not paid to read it - but every councillor who takes the council tax-payers' shilling has a responsibility to be aware of its provisions.
That is not my opinion - that is what it says in the LBWF Constitution. In particular, and this is very relevant to this topic, LBWF has this to say about:

"Preventing Fraud and Corruption
4.10 All Council Members and employees are personally responsible for ensuring integrity in the conduct of the Council’s business, in particular by ensuring that they (and any subordinates) are aware of the Council’s anti-fraud and anti-corruption policies and procedures and by alerting the relevant chief officer or the Chief Internal Auditor to any suspected breach.
4.11 Chief officers are responsible for notifying the Chief Internal Auditor immediately of any suspected fraud, theft, irregularity, improper use or misappropriation of the Council’s property or resources.
4.12 The Chief Finance Officer is responsible for advising the Cabinet and chief officers on the maintenance and implementation of an anti-fraud and anti-corruption policy and associated arrangements for appropriate treatment and registration, by employees and members, of relevant interests, gifts and hospitality."

The whole Constitution is available for reading on the LBWF website (under 'Council and Democracy'). Perhaps it could be put on a CD for all members' bedtime listening

Councillor Loakes seems to be trying to pass the buck which rests within his own office.


Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

E-editions


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »